![]() But what about NATO? They exacerbated the situation by invading. By all rights, if you want to assign a blame on a grand scale, the fault would lay in the lap of CSAT. Russia, the US, the UK, and pretty much every other major nation have engaged in this tactic, some more recently than others. That much is clear, using other nations as a proxy to wage war is nothing we aren't aware of. It takes two to tango, and it takes everyone involved to start a war, but are we really going to boil this down to such a bland, non-committal answer as everyone is at fault? The question of blame is so loaded because it depends on perspective - CSAT started the conflict. Its true from a certain point of view, and I think that's my problem. I'll take a moment to explain my answer below, and why I thought the question itself was not a very good one.Īt first glance one might say: The answer is obvious! Clearly everyone is the answer if you paid attention. I want to talk about the end with the subjective question - whose most to blame? CSAT, FIA, AAF, NATO, or everyone? I want to discuss everyone's answers, and what their perspective is on their answer. Sometimes it fell into some very cliche tropes about war, the you have the scars you can see, and those you can't line jumps to mind (keep in mind something being cliche doesn't make it not true), but all things considered it left a very good impression on me. I just finished the Laws of War DLC, and the mini-missions and narration really impressed me in a few places. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |